Studio Transparency

MYSTIC MOODS

Data review

Reporting Cycle

Annual figures are published per calendar year.
Cumulative totals are updated when a reporting cycle closes or where material revisions are required.

Historic data remains visible for transparency and comparability.


How Data Is Updated

Studio data is reviewed using internal production records.

Updates may occur when:

  • Production totals are finalised after year-end reconciliation

  • Measurement assumptions are refined

  • Benchmark ranges are updated to reflect improved industry data

  • Calculation methodology is improved

Where revisions occur, they are applied transparently across the relevant reporting year.


Methodological Improvements

As the studio scales, reporting precision may improve.

Future updates may include:

  • More granular fibre-specific benchmark factors

  • Improved material yield tracking

  • Refined offcut measurement

  • Third-party benchmark alignment where appropriate

Where methodology changes materially affect reported values, ranges may shift. Historical figures may be restated to preserve consistency.


Review Approach

All environmental impact values are:

  • Presented as conservative ranges

  • Based on benchmark comparisons rather than product-level lifecycle assessments

  • Limited to studio textile material processing unless otherwise stated

No figures represent certified carbon offsets or regulated environmental claims.


Transparency Structure

Reporting is organised as follows:

  • Annual Reports (by year)

  • CO₂ Saved (estimated avoided emissions)

  • Water Saved (estimated avoided water use)

  • Studio Transparency Tracker (visual consolidated record)

Each page may be updated independently as data improves.


Versioning

Where significant updates are made, the reporting cycle or methodology summary will be amended to reflect the revision date.

This ensures traceability without overstating precision.